Talk:Ormiston pairs: Difference between revisions
m
→Should Ormiston pairs be disjoint?: yet more typos :-(
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (Don't really see much benefit of a triples task.) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (→Should Ormiston pairs be disjoint?: yet more typos :-() |
||
Line 17:
::::Although there are a lot of existing OEIS sequences with new ones being added every day, most of them are too trivial or otherwise unsuitable to be worth making an RC task for them. Thundergnat seems to have a knack of finding worthwhile ones to keep the 'usual suspects' happy and I have a look myself from time to time. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
::: I didn't bother adding Ormiston triples to the Ormiston pairs task because it's pretty much exactly the same task, just a whole lot more boring grinding through prime numbers with one extra constraint. Triples doesn't really add anything that the pairs task doesn't have. I'd much rather add tasks that aren't just exercises in processing power. An OEIS harvesting bot doesn't seem very practical, but if you want
| |||