Talk:Ormiston pairs: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Should Ormiston pairs be disjoint?: Responded to Rdm.) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: I don't see anything in the definition used here which requires them to be disjoint. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
: I don't see anything in the definition used here which requires them to be disjoint. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:: Although the remarks in OEIS are confusing, I think you're right so I'm going to change my solutions accordingly which is a minor simplification. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 17:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:11, 31 January 2023
Should Ormiston pairs be disjoint?
Does anyone know the answer to this?
I'd previously assumed they should be - though it makes no difference if they are or not when considering numbers up to 10 million.
However, it does make a difference for numbers up to 100 million - there are 34,901 pairs in total of which 34,876 are disjoint. --PureFox (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)