Anonymous user
Talk:Ordered words: Difference between revisions
→Ruby Golfing?
Line 474:
What do you think?<br>
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
It's pretty idiomatic (would add a couple more spaces and use full words instead of chars for variables), but I agree that it ventures closer to that realm. So, I deleted it.
I was comparing my solution to the "short local version" of the python code. I would argue that my one line of ruby code (which I pulled) is more idiomatic than the python code for the "short local version". The python code fails to use variable names (uses single char variable names), and it leaves a dangling filehandle in the way the file is opened (should use a with..as context manager). Also, given that python is at version 3.4, the use of 2.X print statement syntax is outdated (should be a print function). In other words, I think an argument could be made that my one liner is more idiomatic ruby than the python "short local version". Perhaps that one should be updated in a similar fashion? [I don't really care, I'm just bringing it up for the sake of consistency].
--[[User:Jtprince|Jtprince]] ([[User talk:Jtprince|talk]]) 15:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||