Anonymous user
Talk:Ordered words: Difference between revisions
m
→A bug (which was not really a bug) in Rexx solution: correct misspelling of exhausts. -- ~~~~
m (→Lexicographical order: elided a stray character. -- ~~~~) |
m (→A bug (which was not really a bug) in Rexx solution: correct misspelling of exhausts. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 329:
The answer to your question is: no, anything more than twenty hours is too long, the run takes long enough as it is.
ooRexx consumes too much virtual storage (which is just one of my concerns), and the big classic REXX program is always bumping into the 2G limit (this is for Regina REXX). What I mean is that the program frequently
Another thing to compare would be a REXX program that runs under (say) Regina REXX, and compare it to running under ooRexx (on the same hardward and operating system, of course). It would be an interesting comparison. Since ooRexx was originally (I think) written (coded) by IBM, I assume it has pretty high standards. I really don't know if IBM wrote the code or had it written elsewhere. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 05:58, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
|