Anonymous user
Talk:Ordered words: Difference between revisions
m
→A bug in Rexx solution: added comments about lexicographical order of word list. -- ~~~~
(→Lexicographical order: lexicographical order bit me. -- ~~~~) |
m (→A bug in Rexx solution: added comments about lexicographical order of word list. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 70:
</pre>
Expected result: 1 word of length 5.
: My expectation is: 1 words of length 6. [I didn't think it would be necessary to add a pluralizer to this program, but in hindsight, I should have.] -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Suggested code change under wrong section. sorry.
: "and is not meant for other object-oriented languages"
Line 75 ⟶ 78:
:: When corrected as shown above it runs perfectly well with ooRexx
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 05:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
::: I do not have an ooREXX (other than ROO!) available to check whether it runs under an object-oriented language (nor do I have an interest of doing so as I have often repeated), so I can't answer your query regarding ooRexx. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Looking at the program again I noticed two typos
EBCDICI should be EBCDIC
and then should be than (2 places)
I dare not change your program.
: I had programmed the REXX example to expect a lexicographical ordered word list. I corrected the error. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
| |||