Talk:Ordered words: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→A bug (which was not really a bug) in Rexx solution: added simplication REXX code, query answered. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (thanx) |
||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
</lang> |
</lang> |
||
Of course, if one wanted to break up the complex instruction, then a local (temporary) variable would be needed, along with a PROCEDURE statement. But the Latin alphabet literal isn't needed. I wonder how those German characters would translate on various codepages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC) |
Of course, if one wanted to break up the complex instruction, then a local (temporary) variable would be needed, along with a PROCEDURE statement. But the Latin alphabet literal isn't needed. I wonder how those German characters would translate on various codepages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::thanks for the Roman explanation |
|||
:::not only could, but can as you did. But there's nothing wrong with Procedure. |
|||
:::It makes it readable without comments, I think- |
|||
:::other code pages: AWFUL (even on my DOS Window or command prompt. |
|||
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 03:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |