Talk:Orbital elements: Difference between revisions
→Probably time to clean up this task?
(→Probably time to clean up this task?: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 18:
</pre>
? this could show where we diverge --Walter Pachl 20:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
=== might be a task definition issue ===
It's difficult for me to say for sure (because I am a novice in this area, and because r in <big> r = L/(1 + e cos(angle)) </big> is not defined), but it's currently [http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys440/lectures/ellipse/ellipse.html looking] to me like the angle there should be the ''eccentric anomaly'' instead of the ''true anomaly''. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 19:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
== REXX (version 2) results match Perl 6's ==
Line 29 ⟶ 33:
For example, we have a constraint equation involving <big>r</big>, but nothing about what that r represents.
:The equation is the polar equation for a conic. Just before in the article the Wikipedia article about conics was linked.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 22:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
For example, we've a physics system, but very little about what units we're using.
| |||