Talk:OpenWebNet password: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (Thundergnat moved page Talk:OpenWebNet Password to Talk:OpenWebNet password: Follow normal task title capitalization policy) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Um... --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC) |
Um... --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 14:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Do we want to keep this page? == |
|||
This isn't a (draft) task, is it? It looks like the algorithm shouldn't be publicly available (from http://www.myuremote.com/website/how-to-configure-myuremote-for-bticino-myhome-home-control/ ): "BTicino has chosen a rather strange password policy. Their own tools make a connection using a password. However, the password protocol is not publicly documented." --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 19:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
: Fron the page history there has not been much attention to this page since it was created - and that solely by the creator. I have [[User_talk:Sxpert|asked]] the author to contribute more. If it stays quiet then it might best be deleted, but I would want others opinion. Lets give it a few days... --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 22:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
: I discused this in private and public with the bticino people and they don't seem to bother. this example also shows how attempting to do crypto by yourself when you're not a cryptographer ends up being pretty pointless (so is the ip-based limitations). the code is now used by a number of applications that connect to bticino gateways, and seems useful to a lot of people, in particular it is used by mobile applications that need to access the gateway from 3g networks. --[[User:Sxpert|Sxpert]] ([[User talk:Sxpert|talk]]) 23:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:43, 7 November 2020
Um... --Rdm 14:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)