Talk:Online Certification 17029: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Uploads and autoconfirmed.) |
(Well, there's at least one graphical programming language round here…) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:That sounds reasonable to me. File uploads can sometimes be convenient but they are not the core of rosettacode. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
:That sounds reasonable to me. File uploads can sometimes be convenient but they are not the core of rosettacode. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:: Done. And a bit farther than just 'people without accounts'. The account will need to reach the 'autoconfirmed' point. [http://irclog.perlgeek.de/rosettacode/2011-02-08#i_3267788 additional info]. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 18:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
:: Done. And a bit farther than just 'people without accounts'. The account will need to reach the 'autoconfirmed' point. [http://irclog.perlgeek.de/rosettacode/2011-02-08#i_3267788 additional info]. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 18:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:: Well, except for users of [[Piet]], and they can properly register... –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 9 February 2011
This looks like spam. I'll delete it unless someone states its relevance soon.
Maybe RC shouldn't allow file uploads from people without accounts? --Paddy3118 09:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds reasonable to me. File uploads can sometimes be convenient but they are not the core of rosettacode. --Rdm 16:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Done. And a bit farther than just 'people without accounts'. The account will need to reach the 'autoconfirmed' point. additional info. --Michael Mol 18:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Well, except for users of Piet, and they can properly register... –Donal Fellows 09:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)