Talk:Old lady swallowed a fly: Difference between revisions
→Copyright!: chilling effects.
m (→Copyright!: Sp.) |
(→Copyright!: chilling effects.) |
||
Line 10:
:We should also note that the recording industry is known to a bunch of litigious ''<insert your own appropriate word here>''. Which is another reason to err on the side of caution. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
::Believe me, I'm unlikely to forget. I've lived with a paranoia about the RIAA for over a decade. I've removed the program results, and the code itself is incorrect, though it probably qualifies as a derivative work. I wonder if the current LOC exemptions set for the DMCA includes this form of 'educational use.' That said, I don't think they're going to care terribly much. I still want to look into when/if copyright was registered (the song was produced before things were automagically copyrighted without registration). If I can show that the copyright fell out of registration, or that a current LOC exemption would include RC, then I'd be comfortable moving forward with the task. If I get a DMCA notice, I'll take it down and replace it with an explanation of all the facts and a link to [chillingeffects.org chillingeffects.org]. I won't fight something in a way I can't afford to fight it.--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||