Talk:Object serialization
Serializing object instances which have no state does not seem very meaningful. You could trivially satisfy this task in some languages merely by naming the objects.
Meanwhile, when I think about this issue, a variety of possibilities occur to me, for state. We could even introduce stateful classes and then [by implication] the classes would also need to be serialized -- but I do not think most of the examples do anything like this.
Can we update this task with a little bit of state? Perhaps, we can add a method which reports the time the object was first created? Or would that break all the existing implementations and thus be a bad idea?
Rdm 20:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)