Anonymous user
Talk:Numeric error propagation: Difference between revisions
→Not sure how to do this: One way is to ... (But can be ignored for purposes of task).
(→Not sure how to do this: new section) |
(→Not sure how to do this: One way is to ... (But can be ignored for purposes of task).) |
||
Line 14:
I am not seeing how to make this consistent, except by pushing this burden of analysis onto the programmer. But that approach seems at odds with implementing this as a type. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 15:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
:They should be treated as independent for the purposes of this task, but see the Python solution where I have added a check for an object being multiplied by itself, which means having the same id() in Python (implemented as a check on the memory location occupied by an object in C-Python). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||