Talk:Numeric error propagation: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Task updates==
==Task updates==
Unfortunately I probably won't be able to track comments on this draft task for a couple of days as I will be making the most of a weekend with my beautiful partner without our kids. For what it's worth, I had hoped to make this task rather like [[Quaternion type]]. (Maybe I should change the name to "Error propagation type")? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately I probably won't be able to track comments on this draft task for a couple of days as I will be making the most of a weekend with my beautiful partner without our kids. For what it's worth, I had hoped to make this task rather like [[Quaternion type]]. (Maybe I should change the name to "Error propagation type")? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
==What about correlations?==
Even if error of a and b are fully independent, stuff like (a+b) and (a-b) would be (anti)correlated. What to do with those? Ignore? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 03:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:00, 30 July 2011

Task updates

Unfortunately I probably won't be able to track comments on this draft task for a couple of days as I will be making the most of a weekend with my beautiful partner without our kids. For what it's worth, I had hoped to make this task rather like Quaternion type. (Maybe I should change the name to "Error propagation type")? --Paddy3118 02:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

What about correlations?

Even if error of a and b are fully independent, stuff like (a+b) and (a-b) would be (anti)correlated. What to do with those? Ignore? --Ledrug 03:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)