Anonymous user
Talk:Null object: Difference between revisions
m
added a section header to the 1st topic so that the table of contents (TOC) is in the correct place.
(→Quip?: new section) |
m (added a section header to the 1st topic so that the table of contents (TOC) is in the correct place.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== '''C''' and '''C+''' languages ==
The C anc C++ examples don't really fit the task description (and it's not possible to do so, because C and C++ don't know a generic null object). What you can have is a null ''pointer'', which is a pointer which doesn't point to any object (and that is indeed what <code>NULL</code> is for). The closest to a null object in C++ would be an empty <code>boost::optional</code> from the boost library.
Line 41 ⟶ 42:
== Quip? ==
This task almost demands a reference to Shakespeare's [[wp:Much_Ado_About_Nothing|Much Ado About Nothing]]. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 04:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
== Delphi vs. Pascal ==
The entries of [[Delphi]] and [[Pascal]] in this article should be exchanged, since Pascal is the language, Delphi is one implementation, (one among others)
And since the null-object is no Delphi-specific feature.
|