Talk:Natural sorting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Why draft?) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think I will change it to ask that at least the first four are done then leave the others as "extra credit" - that way language examples will be more comparable. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC) |
I think I will change it to ask that at least the first four are done then leave the others as "extra credit" - that way language examples will be more comparable. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 11:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Note that, unless constrained by their language, a good programmer will implement this as a sort routine that takes a text normalization function, and after the first two examples this task devolves down to writing the normalization function and testing it. (Some languages provide a sort routine which performs suboptimally with this approach but I think we can neglect that issue here.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 12:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:10, 23 April 2011
Why draft?
I'm never sure about Unicode, and this is my first "choose any four from eight" type task description.
I think I will change it to ask that at least the first four are done then leave the others as "extra credit" - that way language examples will be more comparable. --Paddy3118 11:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- Note that, unless constrained by their language, a good programmer will implement this as a sort routine that takes a text normalization function, and after the first two examples this task devolves down to writing the normalization function and testing it. (Some languages provide a sort routine which performs suboptimally with this approach but I think we can neglect that issue here.) --Rdm 12:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)