Talk:Named parameters: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→REXX examples: answered some queries.) |
(→REXX examples: Great. Thanks.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
: I don't see why it would be better to (just) omit REXX, especially as there are two solutions posted. I thought the whole point of Rosetta Code is to show how other languages solve a particular task, even if the solutions may not be understood, idiomatic, or look pretty. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
: I don't see why it would be better to (just) omit REXX, especially as there are two solutions posted. I thought the whole point of Rosetta Code is to show how other languages solve a particular task, even if the solutions may not be understood, idiomatic, or look pretty. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Hi Gerard. Thanks for taking the time to give me your answers. I asked because I was unsure if most REXX users seeing the solutions would consider them "too far from the mainstream" to consider using. Your explanation of the kind of documentation, and what programmers might routinely have to consider when reading/writing REXX have put put me straight on that. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 07:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC) |
|||