Talk:Munchausen numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→0 to the power 0 is considered as 0 for Munchausen numbers
Line 4:
:: True, it would only be an issue if anyone tried to extend this to the next Munchausen number (438 579 088 - also the last known one it seems). --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 21:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
:: Also, if you are using an algorithm where the digits are already split up (so not derived by using mod and division), you don't have to worry about leading zeros e.g. 0030 is "Munchausen" if 0^0 = 1. The non-standard 0^0 = 0 simplifies things. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 21:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
::: Where would those leading zeros come from? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 00:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
| |||