Talk:Multiplicatively perfect numbers: Difference between revisions
Talk:Multiplicatively perfect numbers (view source)
Revision as of 20:12, 17 April 2023
, 1 year agoReplied to Wherrera.
(question about a discrepancy) |
(Replied to Wherrera.) |
||
Line 1:
I put up an example that fits the Wren code, but then noted its result is very different from the Ring result. Is there a problem with the Ring code or the definition of special?
:Assuming the definition is correct, then the Ring solution is not consistent with it. Take the case of n = 64, for example. 16 and 32 are also divisors but he hasn't included them in the product.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 20:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
| |||