Talk:Multiplicatively perfect numbers: Difference between revisions

→‎Vote for deletion: Yet more comment.
(→‎Vote for deletion: Further comment.)
(→‎Vote for deletion: Yet more comment.)
Line 20:
 
::::: I don't think that Thundergnat (or any other member apart from Mike Mol himself) has the power to delete tasks since the switch to Miraheze. What we could do instead is to blank the page or leave it up (as a non-task) but change the language headers to 'level 3' headings which I think will prevent them from messing up the task statistics. Calmosoft has just requested that another of his putative tasks, [[Extreme primes]], be deleted as that's also turned out to be a duplicate so whatever we do for this we can do for that as well. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 17:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 
:::::: Well, the language stats are already messed up with Phix and Wren shown as completing more than 100% of the tasks! As there were 8 solutions to the [[Extreme primes]] exercise, I thought the most sensible solution was to leave it up (as a draft task) but add a stretch goal (q.v) to distinguish it somewhat from the duplicates. Shall we do something similar for this one? We clearly need some sort of policy on these situations as whatever warnings are put up people seem to just add their solutions anyway. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 15:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
9,476

edits