Talk:Modular exponentiation: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Draft change!)
 
(→‎What if m < 0?: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Draft change ==
== Draft change ==
About 21 hours after I posted this draft, I changed the task from "last 20" to "last 40 decimal digits". I adjusted some solutions to print 40 digits, but I did not change the Go or Java programs. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
About 21 hours after I posted this draft, I changed the task from "last 20" to "last 40 decimal digits". I adjusted some solutions to print 40 digits, but I did not change the Go or Java programs. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

== What if m < 0? ==

My draft currently specifies m &ne; 0. The answer when m < 0 might be ill-defined or inconsistent. Should I change from m &ne; 0 to m > 0 here? --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 23:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:18, 20 December 2011

Draft change

About 21 hours after I posted this draft, I changed the task from "last 20" to "last 40 decimal digits". I adjusted some solutions to print 40 digits, but I did not change the Go or Java programs. --Kernigh 19:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

What if m < 0?

My draft currently specifies m ≠ 0. The answer when m < 0 might be ill-defined or inconsistent. Should I change from m ≠ 0 to m > 0 here? --Kernigh 23:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)