Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1: Difference between revisions
Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1 (view source)
Revision as of 20:17, 1 March 2020
, 4 years ago→something's wrong: Thanks for fixing my errors.
(→need for speed: new section) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→something's wrong: Thanks for fixing my errors.) |
||
Line 10:
::: But, "it" could've been an incorrect '''B10''', where the '''B10''' coulda/shoulda/woulda have been '''1,111,111,101''', which would make the original multiplier correct. I could've corrected either value, but one does not want to be accused of vandalism (again). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
::::True, but four of us now have come up now with a multiplier of 12,345,679 for n = 9 and the OEIS reference shows a B10 figure of 111,111,111 for that value of 'n', so I'm as sure as I can be that everything is now in order.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 20:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
::::Ah. I did mess that up. Should know better than to transcribe stuff manually. Thanks to Gerard++ for calling attention to it and Purefox++ for fixing it. I was out most of yesterday afternoon / evening so didn't react quickly. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 20:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
== need for speed ==
| |||