Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (corrected a correction.) |
(Further comment.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: That's all well and good. But, the example that I was talking about shows that '''9 × 123,456,789''' which is the number shown in the task's preamble, not '''9 × 12,345,679'''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
:: That's all well and good. But, the example that I was talking about shows that '''9 × 123,456,789''' which is the number shown in the task's preamble, not '''9 × 12,345,679'''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::: Yes, it was wrong originally but it's correct now. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::Ah, it looks like an '8' has crept into the multiplier - I'll remove it. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
::Ah, it looks like an '8' has crept into the multiplier - I'll remove it. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:41, 29 February 2020
something's wrong
In the task's preamble (in the E.G. section), the 4th multiplication (for a B10 of 111,111,111), the multiplier is incorrect. The multiplier shown would yield a B10 value of 1,111,111,101, which isn't the minimum B10 for a N of 9. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Gerard, you multiply 'n' by the multiplier so 9 x 12,345,679 = 111,111,111 --PureFox (talk) 19:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- That's all well and good. But, the example that I was talking about shows that 9 × 123,456,789 which is the number shown in the task's preamble, not 9 × 12,345,679. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 19:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)