Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1: Difference between revisions

m
added a reply.
(Added further comment)
m (added a reply.)
Line 2:
In the task's preamble &nbsp; (in the '''E.G.''' section), &nbsp; the 4<sup>th</sup> multiplication &nbsp; (for a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''111,111,111'''), &nbsp; the multiplier is incorrect. &nbsp; The multiplier shown would yield a &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; value of &nbsp; '''1,111,111,101''', &nbsp; which isn't the minimum &nbsp; '''B10''' &nbsp; for a &nbsp; '''N''' &nbsp; of &nbsp; '''9'''. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
:Hi Gerard, you multiply 'n' by the multiplier so 9 x 12,345,679 = 111,111,111 --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 
:: That's all well and good. &nbsp; But, the example that I was talking about shows that &nbsp; '''9&nbsp;&times;&nbsp; 123,456,789''' &nbsp; which is the number shown in the task's preamble, &nbsp; not &nbsp;'''9&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;123,456,789'''. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::Ah, it looks like an '8' has crept into the multiplier - I'll remove it. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 19:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)