Talk:Minimum positive multiple in base 10 using only 0 and 1: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→something's wrong: added further comments on what may or may not have been correct (or incorrect).) |
(Another comment.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::: But, "it" could've been an incorrect '''B10''', where the '''B10''' coulda/shoulda/woulda have been '''1,111,111,101''', which would make the original multiplier correct. I could've corrected either value, but one does not want to be accused of vandalism (again). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
::: But, "it" could've been an incorrect '''B10''', where the '''B10''' coulda/shoulda/woulda have been '''1,111,111,101''', which would make the original multiplier correct. I could've corrected either value, but one does not want to be accused of vandalism (again). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
::::True, but four of us now have come up now with a multiplier of 12,345,679 for n = 9 and the OEIS reference shows a B10 figure of 111,111,111 for that value of 'n', so I'm as sure as I can be that everything is now in order.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 20:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||