Talk:Minimum multiple of m where digital sum equals m: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
> 60949999 <<-- reverse the last 7 [which feels wrong and could break other cases]. |
> 60949999 <<-- reverse the last 7 [which feels wrong and could break other cases]. |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
I |
I suppose it could be a completely different method altogether. I guess what I am asking is that given 59998906 how would you as a human using either maths or intuition determine the next plausible candidate number, that still sums to 55 and is still divisible by 11? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 05:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |