Talk:Minimum multiple of m where digital sum equals m: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
- 5 6 |
- 5 6 |
||
= 99999460 |
= 99999460 |
||
> 60949999 <<-- pairwise swap all 8. |
> 60949999 <<-- pairwise swap all 8 [which feels right compared to other cases]. |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
as in add max from left [which feels wrong], or is it add max from right [which feels right and matches the subtraction]: |
|||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
59998906 |
59998906 |
||
| Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
- 5 6 |
- 5 6 |
||
= 69999490 |
= 69999490 |
||
> 60949999 <<-- reverse the last 7. |
> 60949999 <<-- reverse the last 7 [which feels wrong and would break other cases]. |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
I guess it could be a completely different method altogether. I guess what I am asking that given 59998906 how would you as a human using either maths or intuition determine the next number, that still sums to 55 and is still divisible by 11? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 05:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
I guess it could be a completely different method altogether. I guess what I am asking that given 59998906 how would you as a human using either maths or intuition determine the next number, that still sums to 55 and is still divisible by 11? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 05:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
||