Talk:Minesweeper game: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Differences in behavior from classic game: I may have misinterpreted) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::: Oh! I thought that we were just discussing what the clearing ''is'' rather than whether it should be left out? don't think it would be much of a game without a clearing feature of some sort. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 16:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
::: Oh! I thought that we were just discussing what the clearing ''is'' rather than whether it should be left out? don't think it would be much of a game without a clearing feature of some sort. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 16:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::: I've played implementations that didn't recursively clear, but it sounded to me like Dgamey was concerned about the task definition either being unclear, incorrect and/or limiting the use of languages which can solve the task in "spirit" (i.e. allow one to play a game recognizably like Minesweeper), but not easily solve it in its entierity. I was pondering a compromise, but I may have misinterpreted the conversation. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 22:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||