Talk:Matrix with two diagonals: Difference between revisions

Talk:Matrix with two diagonals (view source)

Revision as of 13:54, 5 March 2022

262 bytes removed , 2 years ago

m

I am reverting this, because our anonymous friend does not understand "urban legend" vs "history" See also cve-2010-0517, CVE-2011-0217, https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862, etc.

Rdm

6,962

edits

Revision as of 11:32, 5 March 2022 (view source) rosettacode>Anonymous31415927 m (→‎Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:54, 5 March 2022 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) m (I am reverting this, because our anonymous friend does not understand "urban legend" vs "history" See also cve-2010-0517, CVE-2011-0217, https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862, etc.) Newer edit →
Line 29: :::::Having said that, there was a task a day or two back where I didn't understand the author's solution (written in Quackery) but I still managed to achieve the same output even though it later turned out that my understanding of the task was incorrect! --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 12:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC) ~~::::::~~-- '''Sorry to say, childs, but dangerous-JPEG is an old urban legend.''' The https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2004-0200 was in 2004 and was caused by '''a bug in MS Windows''' (GDI+), not that it was JPEG. ~~'''~~ But I understand - '''some people's ass is on fire because they are afraid of exploits from 2004.''' I would advise you to drink a glass of water, switch from MS Windows 98 to MS Windows 11, install all updates and anti-virus program other than Kaspersky. And take the pills prescribed by your doctor regularly.▼ ~~::::::~~ Likewise, Samantha virus was not a de facto JPEG file, it only pretended to be one. Which was only possible because a few of the less clever MS programmers thought they had a good idea of hiding the file extension from users.▼ ~~::::::~~ '''In fact, every link - and even the image of the Rosseta stone displayed on the Rosseta Code website - could be ... oh yo oh ah - terrible and terrible CVE. Fear and terror, terror and hiccups. We should all be dead. ~~But every day we somehow open thousands of jpegs (img elements) on websites and we live? Strange isn~~'~~t it?~~''▼ '''But every day we somehow open thousands of jpegs on websites and we live? Strange isn't it?''' ~~:::::: '''Sorry to say, childs, but dangerous-JPEG is an old urban legend / hoax.'''~~ The real problem with jpegs is that they can contain obscene, shocking content. ▲:::::: The https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2004-0200 was in 2004 and was caused by '''a bug in MS Windows (GDI+), not that it was JPEG. ''' But I understand - '''some people's ass is on fire because they are afraid of exploits from 2004.''' I would advise you to drink a glass of water, switch from MS Windows 98 to MS Windows 11, install all updates and anti-virus program other than Kaspersky. And take the pills prescribed by your doctor regularly. ▲:::::: Likewise, Samantha virus was not a de facto JPEG file, it only pretended to be one. Which was only possible because a few of the less clever MS programmers thought they had a good idea of hiding the file extension from users. ▲:::::: In fact, every link - and even the image of the Rosseta stone displayed on the Rosseta Code website - could be ... oh yo oh ah - terrible and terrible CVE. Fear and terror, terror and hiccups. We should all be dead. But every day we somehow open thousands of jpegs (img elements) on websites and we live? Strange isn't it? :::::: '''The real problem with jpegs is that they can contain obscene, shocking content.''' And when they are stored on an external, untrusted, server, they can be changed/replaced against our will. Instead of an example solution to a mathematical problem, there will be, for example, a fluffy puppy.