Talk:Matrix with two diagonals: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: Supplementary remarks.) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
JPEGs are susceptible to exploits, and it seems a pity to risk the impression of obliging others to |
JPEGs are susceptible to exploits, and it seems a pity to risk the impression of obliging others to |
||
do something which is potentially insecure. |
do something which is potentially insecure. |
||
(My advice to others would be: never click on a direct JPEG link offered by an unknown host). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
(My advice to others would be: never click on a direct JPEG link offered by an unknown host). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
:::::Having said that, there was a task a day or two back where I didn't understand the author's solution (written in Quackery) but I still managed to achieve the same output even though it later turned out that my understanding of the task was incorrect! --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 12:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
:::::Having said that, there was a task a day or two back where I didn't understand the author's solution (written in Quackery) but I still managed to achieve the same output even though it later turned out that my understanding of the task was incorrect! --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 12:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
-- '''Sorry to say, childs, but dangerous-JPEG is an old urban legend.''' |
|||