Talk:Marching squares: Difference between revisions
m
→Task needs work: wrap up
m (→Task needs work: another goof in observation on my part.) |
m (→Task needs work: wrap up) |
||
Line 4:
::'''Incorrect:''' The Julia and Python entries also start with the same q-shaped input. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
::: Thanks. Fixed, below. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 19:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Currently, the task description does not allow us to determine whether an implementation is correct.
Line 28 ⟶ 30:
0 1 1 1 0</pre>
This transformation lacks symmetry which makes it suspect. Currently there's nothing in the task description to help us understand this issue. It's difficult to see how this corresponds to a contour of the original image, but if the above were rotated counterclockwise 90 degrees, the inner region of zeros
<pre>0 0 1 1 0
| |||