Anonymous user
Talk:Man or boy test: Difference between revisions
→Clarify!
Line 17:
::Don't you think that asking the person who doesn't understand the task to explain it is a bit silly?
::: No. Because those people who had problems with understanding the task have a feeling where the problems are, and what information they need (once they understand what is meant).
::::I and Sgeier are not offering a task description now. We are offering task description descriptions. '''You''', because you know what to do for this task, should give a task description.
:: Right now what we have for the "directions" for this task is an explanation of why it was done, a silly quote, and nothing else. The description says nothing about nested subroutines or stack frames. It needs ''steps or characteristics'' at the ''top'' of the page. Don't link to another page to explain the task. Don't hope that people can decode the task from other languages.
::: See what I mean? ''You'' know very well what is needed. Much better then me :-)
Line 23:
Especially, don't trust task description to someone who doesn't understand the task (like me and Sgeier in this case). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 08:54, 27 March 2008 (MDT)
::: Which part of it is still unclear? --[[User:Dirkt|Dirkt]] 15:28, 27 March 2008 (MDT)
::::There are no commands in the task description. There are no restrictions. The BASIC program proposed before accomplishes the task. Also thie BASIC program does:
::::<pre>
</pre>
::::because THERE IS NO TASK!! This article is more of an encyclopedia article (and a bad one at that) with arbitrary code on it. Maybe the title of this section should be "give actual directions" instead of "clarify!". --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:08, 27 March 2008 (MDT)
| |||