Anonymous user
Talk:MD5/Implementation: Difference between revisions
→Off-site code
m (→Pseudo Code is not enough: title) |
|||
Line 48:
::::Or am I completely off base here? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 12:44, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
::::: I don't understand the distinction. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 02:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
::::: Neither did I but it is now very clear. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 18:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:::::: One case in point, one of the original MD5 tasks (Autohotkey?) is largely coded natively but uses a couple of callouts for minor functions. I would take this as largely meeting the intent of the task as it still shows bit manipulation, etc., etc.
=== Gimmie for C? ===
Given that the IETF reference implementation is written in C, should C get a gimmie and use a link to the code? --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 21:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
| |||