Talk:MD5/Implementation: Difference between revisions
→Off-site code
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 49:
::::: I don't understand the distinction. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 02:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
::::: Neither did I but it is now very clear. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 18:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:::::: One case in point, one of the original MD5 tasks (Autohotkey?) is largely coded natively but uses a couple of callouts for minor functions. I would take this as largely meeting the intent of the task as it still shows bit manipulation, etc., etc. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 18:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:::::: The distinction is that the first is permissive -- it accepts an implementation on this site for that case, but does not prohibit alternatives (RFC 2119 "MAY" or "SHOULD"). My proposed revision prohibits alternatives (RFC 2119 "MUST"). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 20:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
=== Gimmie for C? ===
| |||