Talk:Lychrel numbers: Difference between revisions
→simpler wording
(→simpler wording: Simpler?) |
|||
Line 58:
:Isn't it the case that while the latter may be technically correct and less wordy, the former states more explicitly the omission of zero? I tend to want to keep the former. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
:: Why is this even an issue? Regardless of whether or not 0 is tested, 0 is not a Lychrel number because 0+0 = 0 and 0 is a palindrome. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 18:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||