Talk:Loops/While: Difference between revisions

m
→‎REXX: added yet another comment about the REXX deletions saga. -- ~~~~
m (→‎REXX: added comments about a lot of time wasted. -- ~~~~)
m (→‎REXX: added yet another comment about the REXX deletions saga. -- ~~~~)
Line 21:
Once I got all that fixed up, ''another'' REXX version 1 was entered, whenceforth I flagged the bogus (1st first version)
with multiple pink-flags, least of all, the first 1st version couldn't even execute (run), let alone produce output (but incorrect output was shown), and there were at least two major errors such that the REXX first first version would raise a (fatal) "syntax error" (or rather, "syntax errors").   Other program errors were also mentioned in my pink-flagging.   I don't know where he got the output from, which included part of a REXX comment.   The resultant 1st 1st version looked like it was composed by someone trying to imitate someone's first attempt at the REXX language.
 
[The bad bad REXX 1st first version was then deleted by you.]
 
It sure was a lot of wasted time just to get back to a decent version(s) of the original posting/submission.   I wish I could get all that wasted spent time back.   You may have thought it was a joke, but the wasted time was not.   If it was a joke, I didn't see any humor in it all all, I perceived it as malicious, for it was a lot of time spent in making it right again, not to mention the non-humorous non-joke.