Talk:Loops/N plus one half: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
("best") |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→Number of items may not be known: new section) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
The other problem is defining "best". For example, the third COBOL posting uses GO TO. It's really fast, but is it the "best" way of doing it? [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] ([[User talk:Axtens|talk]]) 15:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
The other problem is defining "best". For example, the third COBOL posting uses GO TO. It's really fast, but is it the "best" way of doing it? [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] ([[User talk:Axtens|talk]]) 15:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Number of items may not be known == |
|||
Most (all?) solutions shown so far rely on the number of items (10) being known. Rexx version 3 does not! --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 09:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||