Talk:Loops/Infinite: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(New page: Why was the UnixPipes entry yes SPAM removed? (I think sequences are a way to generate loops in pipes, just as recursion is used to simulate loops in functional languages like haskell)....) |
m (moved Talk:Loop/Infinite to Talk:Loops/Infinite) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
(see for loop too) |
(see for loop too) |
||
[[User:Rahul|Rahul]] 12:16, 11 April 2008 (MDT) |
[[User:Rahul|Rahul]] 12:16, 11 April 2008 (MDT) |
||
---- |
|||
The code for many programming language is not a complete program. Why is this? |
|||
--[[Special:Contributions/79.77.166.164|79.77.166.164]] 20:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:42, 6 February 2010
Why was the UnixPipes entry
yes SPAM
removed? (I think sequences are a way to generate loops in pipes, just as recursion is used to simulate loops in functional languages like haskell). So a loop of printing it 5 times would be
yes SPAM | head -n 5
(see for loop too) Rahul 12:16, 11 April 2008 (MDT)
The code for many programming language is not a complete program. Why is this?
--79.77.166.164 20:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)