Talk:Longest substrings without repeating characters: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→All the longest or a maximally long substring?: substrings is plural) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (further evidence) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The task description does not make it clear whether or not all maximally long substrings should be found. --[[User:Peak| Peak]] |
The task description does not make it clear whether or not all maximally long substrings should be found. --[[User:Peak| Peak]] |
||
: I am not the task author but 'substrings' being plural is a strong hint to me that multiple ones could / should be returned. BTW, please sign your comments. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC) |
: I am not the task author but 'substrings' being plural is a strong hint to me that multiple ones could / should be returned. And, every task entry so far, (jq excluded) including the task authors, returns multiple substrings. BTW, please sign your comments. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:12, 6 September 2021
All the longest or a maximally long substring?
The task description does not make it clear whether or not all maximally long substrings should be found. -- Peak
- I am not the task author but 'substrings' being plural is a strong hint to me that multiple ones could / should be returned. And, every task entry so far, (jq excluded) including the task authors, returns multiple substrings. BTW, please sign your comments. --Thundergnat (talk) 11:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)