Anonymous user
Talk:Long multiplication: Difference between revisions
→Wrong algorithms
Line 83:
:::: [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] ([[User talk:NevilleDNZ|talk]])
::::: Perhaps the task should be defined in two parts - one to represent the intermediate results, the other to go from the intermediate results to the final results?
::: I do not really see a point in asking for the code in languages where arbitrary precision is already builtin. For one, it should not lead newcomers of a language to do it that way. And second, as the builtin operators are usually highly tuned to the task, which a naive piece of code usually is not. Also, I found other languages, where it seemed perfectly ok to write a comment like "is native in language" (sidef) or even a call to BigInt arithmetic (D), so I think that should be also ok for languages like scheme, self, smalltalk etc. And b.t.w. what about languages which support an
--[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 15:18, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
|