Talk:Long literals, with continuations: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Long literals, with continuations (view source)

Revision as of 15:57, 25 March 2020

754 bytes added , 4 years ago

moved my comment so as to be replying to a query after my query was moved to the wrong place.

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger

Revision as of 14:47, 25 March 2020 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) (→‎Enforcing imaginary rules: I'm not getting into an argument) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 15:57, 25 March 2020 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger (moved my comment so as to be replying to a query after my query was moved to the wrong place.)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 38: ::* Admittedly, my (Raku) entry has some extra stuff in an attempt to make the task less boring, but it still follows the exact letter of every pointless, irrelevant constraint. :: If you really want the ~~tasks~~task to be about a comparison of how different programming languages handle literal data '''then why isn't that the task?''' See [[Quoting constructs]] for what the task ''could'' have been. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 14:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC) ::: Because I choose to have the task to be about how (different) computer programming languages handle   (or specify, define, express)   long literals with continuations.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 15:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC) ::: Your comments about pointless and irrelevant constraints isn't germane to the task's description and/or requirements.   Adding code to make the task less boring just makes it harder to compare computer programming languages (in regards to how other entries solve the task at hand.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger\|talk]]) 15:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)