Anonymous user
Talk:Linear congruential generator: Difference between revisions
→Should the vectorized variant of the X86 Assembly LCG be included?
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 50:
I recently read the instructions on this page more thoroughly. I initially believed that it was only necessary to create an LCG, not to replicate an existing implementation. The example posted under "Second example using AVX instructions." does not produce identical output to the Microsoft rand(). Should this example be removed completely? For now, I will add a comment to the vectorized implementation explaining that its output will differ from Microsoft rand(). [[User:Emjay|Emjay]] ([[User talk:Emjay|talk]]) 21:38, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
: I would mark it as incorrect, maybe someone can fix it. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 00:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
:: I did what you suggested, and am curious to see what the solution might be, as my understanding of mathematics is very limited. Thank you for the input, please feel free to offer any other suggestions; I am new to this site, and wiki editing in general. [[User:Emjay|Emjay]] ([[User talk:Emjay|talk]]) 18:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
| |||