Talk:Letter frequency: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Task description: added comment (query) about using the Latin alphabet for English. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→a few remarks for Rexx: new section) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
"Letter frequency" is not the same as "letter occurences". The title hints that more is needed in the task description. It would seem that some description of output is required as well. --[[User:Demivec|Demivec]] 16:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
"Letter frequency" is not the same as "letter occurences". The title hints that more is needed in the task description. It would seem that some description of output is required as well. --[[User:Demivec|Demivec]] 16:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== a few remarks for Rexx == |
|||
A few typos: |
|||
carraiage -> carriage |
|||
occurances -> occurrences |
|||
independant -> independent |
|||
and some more substantial observations: |
|||
y=d2x(L); if @.up.y==0 then iterate /*zero count? Then ignore letter*/ |
|||
c=d2c(L) /*C is the hex version of of char*/ |
|||
In such cases I use cnt.0up.y so that a possible variable up never interferes |
|||
actually y is the hex version , drop one ‘of’ |
|||
@.=0 /*wouldn't it be neat to use Θ ? */ |
|||
why not use cnt. ? |
|||
In the discussion I read: |
|||
“Case sensitivity? Count what you get without applying any uppercase/lowercase filters” |
|||
upper c -> c=translate(c) would help for other Rexxes (in particular ooRexx) |
|||
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 09:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||