Talk:Last letter-first letter: Difference between revisions
→Task description change proposal:
(→Number of names: it's a lot) |
|||
Line 55:
::Agree. Given that our current algorithms explore all possible paths, the current list of 79(?) might be rather tedious for some of the slower interpreted languages. 20 was proposed above. The initial PicoLisp had a solution on a list of 64 names. Maybe something in that range would be better? —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 17:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Oops, yes, it looks like 79 -- I need to run the silly thing again -- I need a bigger laptop if I am going to be working on this size of problem. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 17:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
== Go "two interpretations of longest" ==
| |||