Anonymous user
Talk:Largest int from concatenated ints: Difference between revisions
Talk:Largest int from concatenated ints (view source)
Revision as of 19:00, 11 April 2016
, 8 years ago→Negative integers: As an extension?
(→Negative integers: As an extension?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4:
:Yep. I'm sloppy. I will fix this.[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
:: Why can't zero be included? That is, allow non-negative integers. The programs (I think) won't barf if zero would be included in the list. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
:::Well there is no need to wonder what a number with leading zeros is. Some conventions say ignore leading zeros on an int; others might treat it as signifying that the int should be considered as written in anther base, ... It's peripheral to the task, I guess you could state it as an extension to the task and how these leading zeroes are interpreted by your program, but you should have a first version that fits the task I would think. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
==Duplicates?==
| |||