Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Binding with other site features: new section
(→Goal Direction / Logical Paridigms: Add it) |
(→Binding with other site features: new section) |
||
Line 129:
I've been starting to look at the LCT and some of the parameters and have some questions. Specifically, I was looking at goal directed evaluation in Icon/Unicon which is similar to things that Prolog does. There doesn't seem to be a paradigm for this and I was thinking there should be. How do others feel? [[User:Dgamey|David]] 2010-04-06
: Add it; I don't think there's a standards body for defining paradigms. :) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
== Binding with other site features ==
Does anyone have thoughts on ways of binding the LCT with the extended options for [[Template:Language]], and the pages/categories that use [[Template:Feature]]? I'd like the LCT to get greater visibility, but I think it needs to be a bit more integrated. (Nevermind that the ehnancements to Template:Language and the categories that use Template:Feature were inspired by the LCT.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||