Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Goal Direction / Logical Paridigms: Add it
m (→Goal Direction / Logical Paridigms: +name) |
(→Goal Direction / Logical Paridigms: Add it) |
||
Line 128:
I've been starting to look at the LCT and some of the parameters and have some questions. Specifically, I was looking at goal directed evaluation in Icon/Unicon which is similar to things that Prolog does. There doesn't seem to be a paradigm for this and I was thinking there should be. How do others feel? [[User:Dgamey|David]] 2010-04-06
: Add it; I don't think there's a standards body for defining paradigms. :) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||