Anonymous user
Talk:Language Comparison Table: Difference between revisions
→Garbage Collection?: new section
No edit summary |
(→Garbage Collection?: new section) |
||
Line 60:
::: Also note that the standard always mentions references explicitly after objects, where both objects and references can be used.
::: But of course you are invited to quote relevant parts of the standard (of a draft of your choice) to try to disproof me. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 14:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
== Garbage Collection? ==
I'm not sure how interesting the stat would be, but how do you guys feel about adding a "Has [[Garbage Collection]]" column to the table? I don't know how many modern language don't have it. The only languages I can be sure of are Java and C/C++. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |||