Anonymous user
Talk:Iterated digits squaring: Difference between revisions
→OK this is what I've done: added comments about adding a draft task template.
(→Name change?: Could be...) |
(→OK this is what I've done: added comments about adding a draft task template.) |
||
Line 72:
==OK this is what I've done==
I have created a new task [[Combinations with repetitions/Square Digit Chain]] into which I think the Combinatoric solutions fit better. Note that [[Combinations with repetitions]] has 2 methods in D. I found the J solution interesting, and there are probably other non-comb things to be said in this task. Gerard Schildberger returned this task to draft on 26th., August without saying why, I added the explanation of the Combinatorics and made it a task again. I've now returned it to draft pending a clearer description of what goes here.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
: What I saw at the time of the my updating the REXX section was that this Rosetta Code entry didn't appear to be a task (or any type of task) at all (as I didn't see any TASK or DRAFT TASK statement with the <nowiki> {{ xxx }} </nowiki> braces around anything) at the beginning of the Rosetta Code ... er, "task". So, as my summary comment said, I '''added''' the draft task template (as there appeared to not be any template at all, task nor draft task). I certainly didn't intend to promote or demote any ... thingy/task. I'm sorry for the retrograde revision, it was not my intent to revert any task back to draft status, my intent was to just provide a template ('''draft''' seemed safer to add) where there appeared to be none at all. It was this (apparent) lack of any template that prompted me to add a draft-task template. Perhaps it was a stale version that I was viewing; this wouldn't be the first time a global edit change was processed or presented incorrectly. I again apologize for any misdeed occurring on my behalf of my good intentions, albeit done incorrectly or by happenstance. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
|