Talk:Integer comparison: Difference between revisions

m
added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).
m (added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).)
 
Line 1:
== Pop11 & Standard ML examples ==
 
The Pop11 and Standard ML examples don't implement the task properly. Please note that the task explicitly contains "Test the condition for each case separately, so that all three comparison operators are used in the code." As is, those examples don't use the equality comparison operator. That is, they don't demonstrate how to compare for equality directly (in case those languages indeed only allow to test for integer equality by testing that one is neither larger nor smaller than the other — which I strongly doubt — it should be explicitly stated). --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 13:21, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
 
== Perl ==
Line 5 ⟶ 8:
Does the Perl example output the relation between the two numbers? I don't know Perl, but it doesn't look like it prints anything. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 07:26, 25 April 2008 (MDT)
: An old comment, I know. But yes, the Perl function needs to be wrapped in code to get user input and display the result. Fixed. --[[User:Snoman|Snoman]] 11:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 
 
== when would two *integers* fail to compare? ==