Talk:Inheritance/Single/C: Difference between revisions
→OO?: Wise as an example, but not a recommendation.
(→OO?) |
(→OO?: Wise as an example, but not a recommendation.) |
||
Line 13:
: I understand. I thought I'd do this more or less for pedagogical(sp?) purposes. Some comment about C not being a OO language is certainly appropriate. If you're familiar with the X window system, you'll see some similarities between what's in the XtIntrinsic library and some of this code. That was all a C based Object system, much more complete than this. --[[User:Rldrenth|Rldrenth]] 05:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
: (My opinion) The "Unimplemented task" pages specifically list tasks marked as omitted, yet encourages people to try to implement them. Proofs of concepts such can illustrate where a problem may be solveable using a language, yet be particularly unidiomatic. In short, it can show how you might need to do something if you really have to, but also serve as a warning suggesting there may be a better way. In short, I think the ''example'' is wise, but as an example, not a recommendation. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 06:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
| |||